This is an excellent blog post by Denise Fenzi on why corrections are unnecessary and counter productive.
I often hear it said that avoiding correction is “withholding half of the information that dogs needs to succeed.” The idea is that by telling the dog both when when they are right AND when they are wrong, that they can learn with more clarity, and therefore be happier dogs who understand exactly what we want from them. You can define correction however you wish.
Is this true?
If you teach a dog with clear criteria for success (what you want) then your dog will automatically learn what is wrong, and since being wrong is perfectly fine and is part of the learning process, there’s no reason to avoid it.
Let’s consider it more closely.
On a scale of -10 to +10, with -10 as the most awful thing that you can do to a dog and +10 as being the most amazing reward, what does a dog, or a human…
View original post 949 more words